Skip to content

EPC C case study landlord projects: how we choose and publish them

EPC C case study landlord projects: how we choose and publish them (photograph)

An EPC C case study landlord readers can trust must be real, consented and checkable. This page explains how we choose each case study and what it will show. Work is delivered by LAMTANS Engineering Ltd. Compliant Lets is a trading name of LAMTANS Holdings Ltd. Checked 21 October 2026.

Talk to us about your rentals

How we choose case studies

We publish real landlord projects only when each one meets every rule below.

  • The customer has given written consent to the case study.
  • The before and after EPC results are real and lodged on the national register.
  • The costs and funding shown are taken from the job records.
  • The customer received nothing in return for agreeing.

Names and addresses stay private unless the customer agrees to share them. We never invent a case, a customer or a quote.

Real landlord projects: what each page will show

Each page follows the same layout, so you can compare projects.

SectionWhat you will see
Starting pointThe property type, tenancy and EPC before the work
PlanThe measures chosen and why
FundingThe grants used, with scheme names and dates
CostThe cost of the job, with the basis
ResultThe post-works EPC and any limits on the result

A new EPC can come out lower or higher than expected. If a result falls short, we say so. Our how we work page explains the steps behind each project.

EPC C case study landlord entries

Reviews are separate

Case studies are not reviews. Reviews will appear only when they come from an independent platform. Reviews of LAMTANS Engineering Ltd will be labelled as such.

Plan your own rentals

You can start with our EPC C 2030 guide or request an assessment. Read the editorial policy to see how we check what we publish.

Sources

Designed & developed by LAMTANS Technologies LLC, USA — part of the LAMTANS Group